Global Food Grab - The Effort To Control The World’s Food Supply
1,039 Views
Filed under: General, Collapse, Practical Preparations — admin @ 10:08 am
Two food articles worth paying attention to.
First up: Government to government plan to seize control of all food.
And we also have this: New Zealand law mirrors US and Canada, fake food safety bills.
New Zealand is about to witness what we have here in the US; small retailers, family farms and ranches raided by agency swat teams, business and lives destroyed, property illegally destroyed or seized while Big Ag operations responsible for horrendous contamination of various sectors of food production receive only a warning letter and never miss a day in their crappy operations.
The global grab on the world’s food supply isn’t about protecting anybody. It is about making sure that you and everyone else on this entire planet is forced to buy something extremely essential like food from a gigantic Ag-business. These companies will have the power of life or death, something they already have now, but it will be significantly worse in the days ahead.
Even growing your own food, or buying it from the local co-op or farmers market is now at risk.
We all seem to think we are not at risk, because we are not yet experiencing the utter defeat being experienced by other countries. In India alone, over 200,000 farmers are already known to have committed suicide. The reason is because they are being forced into bankruptcy, having to buy GMO modified seeds from the Ag giants, who could care less about your health, your freedom, or your right to eat safe, healthy foods. All they care about is that you are being forced by necessity (to stay alive) that every dollar you spend has gone into their pockets.
Nobody has any idea how many other farmers have just utterly given up or killed themselves.
It’s getting serious folks. If you want to survive into the future, then you are going to have to start helping yourselves.
I’ve seen ZERO evidence that the best interests of the people are being supported. What I have seen however, is agency after agency, government after government, and entity after entity being arrayed against the individual and collective rights of the people in a non-stop fashion, forcing us all into a tighter and tighter grip.
I’ve predicted this long ago, which was nothing more then simply charting the path forward. Looking at where we’ve been, where we are going, and the most likely outcome is pretty easy to determine. The 2010 - 2020 predictions are still as valid as ever, with many of these events now well underway.
We are now on the verge of 2012 hysteria, just wait and see if you don’t believe this. We’re already in the “countdown”. I do think we will see even more major environmental and climate related disaster in 2012 then we did in 2011 (now numbering in the hundreds). These things and many more, such as the financial collapse, is driving the desperation and fear of governments, who are now attacking their citizens in increasingly violent ways.
If you don’t think stealing your food is violent, then you need to reexamine your entire premises. Violence against another is doing anything against their will. It need not be physical violence, it can be financial or emotional. These activities all wind up being violence against you when they have reached their ultimate conclusions. Many are also utilizing the threat of violence. If you do not comply, you will be arrested, jailed and incarcerated. Farmers around the world face this threat of violence every day, and in reality, so do you, minute by minute.
Follow link below to more Government exsposure.
http://survivalacres.com/wordpress/?cat=14
Monday, February 13, 2012
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Will You Defend The Constitution Against Obama and the U.N.? Only One Politician Will
Dear U.S.A. Citizen,
Throughout my time in Congress, I've been known to be the lone “No” vote a time or two.
People often wonder how I've been able to so frequently take those stands against such massive opposition, but the answer's really quite simple.
I gave my word.
And I was raised in a household that believed your word is your bond.
So when I took my oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States, I meant every bit of it.
And I'll bring the same sincerity and dedication to the oath I will take as President.
But to get there, I need your help now more than ever.
Please, pledge today to donate whatever you are able toward our February 14 Money Bomb.
Unfortunately, my opponents for the Republican nomination can't make the same promise I just did.
Click to pledge
Their records show exactly what they think of the Constitution's limits on government power.
Whether it's supporting forcing Americans to buy only the health insurance the government approves of, restricting our gun rights, allowing Big Labor to continue to run roughshod over our workers, helping Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac wreck our economy, or voting to double the size of the Department of Education and to implement the largest expansion of entitlement spending since President Johnson, my opponents just don't get it.
The Constitution isn't a means to an end or a campaign trail talking point you use to excite the audience while crossing your fingers behind your back.
It's the law of the land.
It's what we're supposed to use to bind the federal government from invading every area of our lives.
Most importantly, it's what those of us trusted with public office vow to uphold.
With your help on February 14, I'll keep taking the message about my unmatched record of support for the Constitution to millions of voters.
I've never voted to raise the debt ceiling. (Rick Santorum can't say the same.)
I've never voted to hand over millions of taxpayer dollars to organizations that perform abortions. (There's no excuse for Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum's votes to do so.)
I've never supported addressing our health care crisis with force. (Governor Romney won't have a leg to stand on against President Obama on this issue.)
I've never supported stretching our troops thin all over the world to nation-build. (Just one of the reasons I get more donations from active-duty military than Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum combined.)
As your Republican nominee, I'll run on - not away from - my record.
Our nation is already being driven further off course by a President who has thrown the Constitution out the window.
You and I can't afford four more years of someone who will keep acting the same way, regardless of which Party's letter is beside his name.
So today, help make sure America will have a President who honors his word by pledging to make your most generous contribution to my campaign on February 14.
For Liberty,
Ron Paul
P.S. I've worked hard in Congress to defend the Constitution, because I gave my word that I would do so, regardless of how many others stood with me.
Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum have all supported massive expansions in government power throughout their careers, so we know exactly how loyal they'll remain to their constitutional limitations as President.
I'm running to give the American people a clear choice, and I hope I'll have your continued support to get my message out.
Please, pledge today to make your most generous contribution toward our February 14 Money Bomb so I can keep contacting millions of voters about my unmatched record of consistent constitutional conservatism.
Throughout my time in Congress, I've been known to be the lone “No” vote a time or two.
People often wonder how I've been able to so frequently take those stands against such massive opposition, but the answer's really quite simple.
I gave my word.
And I was raised in a household that believed your word is your bond.
So when I took my oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States, I meant every bit of it.
And I'll bring the same sincerity and dedication to the oath I will take as President.
But to get there, I need your help now more than ever.
Please, pledge today to donate whatever you are able toward our February 14 Money Bomb.
Unfortunately, my opponents for the Republican nomination can't make the same promise I just did.
Click to pledge
Their records show exactly what they think of the Constitution's limits on government power.
Whether it's supporting forcing Americans to buy only the health insurance the government approves of, restricting our gun rights, allowing Big Labor to continue to run roughshod over our workers, helping Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac wreck our economy, or voting to double the size of the Department of Education and to implement the largest expansion of entitlement spending since President Johnson, my opponents just don't get it.
The Constitution isn't a means to an end or a campaign trail talking point you use to excite the audience while crossing your fingers behind your back.
It's the law of the land.
It's what we're supposed to use to bind the federal government from invading every area of our lives.
Most importantly, it's what those of us trusted with public office vow to uphold.
With your help on February 14, I'll keep taking the message about my unmatched record of support for the Constitution to millions of voters.
I've never voted to raise the debt ceiling. (Rick Santorum can't say the same.)
I've never voted to hand over millions of taxpayer dollars to organizations that perform abortions. (There's no excuse for Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum's votes to do so.)
I've never supported addressing our health care crisis with force. (Governor Romney won't have a leg to stand on against President Obama on this issue.)
I've never supported stretching our troops thin all over the world to nation-build. (Just one of the reasons I get more donations from active-duty military than Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum combined.)
As your Republican nominee, I'll run on - not away from - my record.
Our nation is already being driven further off course by a President who has thrown the Constitution out the window.
You and I can't afford four more years of someone who will keep acting the same way, regardless of which Party's letter is beside his name.
So today, help make sure America will have a President who honors his word by pledging to make your most generous contribution to my campaign on February 14.
For Liberty,
Ron Paul
P.S. I've worked hard in Congress to defend the Constitution, because I gave my word that I would do so, regardless of how many others stood with me.
Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum have all supported massive expansions in government power throughout their careers, so we know exactly how loyal they'll remain to their constitutional limitations as President.
I'm running to give the American people a clear choice, and I hope I'll have your continued support to get my message out.
Please, pledge today to make your most generous contribution toward our February 14 Money Bomb so I can keep contacting millions of voters about my unmatched record of consistent constitutional conservatism.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
NEWT GINGRICH: Mr. New World Order
Newt Gingrich: Mr. New World Order
The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store
Establishment throws its weight behind the ultimate RINO globalist
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Infowars.com
Monday, November 28, 2011
Desperate to derail Ron Paul’s momentum in New Hampshire, the key early primary state in which polls show Paul has a very real chance of winning, the establishment has thrown its weight behind Newt Gingrich, the ultimate RINO globalist who in reality is about as conservative as Mao Tse-tung.
With the campaigns of Mitt Romney and Rick Perry collapsing, the editorial board of the New Hampshire Union Leader chose to endorse Gingrich on Sunday, a move that the mainstream press immediately hailed as all-important, attempting to bestow kingmaker status on a relatively irrelevant newspaper in the grand scheme of things.
The anointment of Gingrich as Republican frontrunner is just the latest desperate bid to fool voters into supporting anyone other than Ron Paul. From Perry, to Romney, to Cain – the establishment has attempted to crown all of them as top dog – failing every time as each campaign subsequently crashes and burns.
Gingrich will inevitably follow suit because he has more skeletons in the closet than a halloween costume shop. Newt Gingrich is Mr. New World Order – a committed globalist who Gingrich will inevitably follow suit because he has more skeletons in the closet than a halloween costume shop. Newt Gingrich is Mr. New World Order – a committed globalist who has publicly made clear his contempt for American sovereignty and freedom on a plethora of occasions, not least when he joined forces with Nancy Pelosi to push the Obama administration’s cap and trade agenda that would have completely bankrupted the country.
“I think if you have mandatory carbon caps combined with a trading system, much like we did with sulfur, and if you have a tax-incentive program for investing in the solutions, that there’s a package there that’s very, very good,” Gingrich told PBS Frontline in February 2007.
And if you think that doesn’t sound bad enough, just wait until you read what Gingrich had to say about mandatory health insurance.
“Personal responsibility extends to the purchase of health insurance. Citizens should not be able to cheat their neighbors by not buying insurance, particularly when they can afford it, and expect others to pay for their care when they need it,” he wrote in a 2007 OpEd for the Des Moines Register.
That’s right – self-proclaimed “conservative” Gingrich is an aggressive supporter of Obamacare, just like his rival Mitt Romney.
Gingrich has also been instrumental in pushing political frameworks with the goal of accomplishing global governance.
As Attorney Constance Cumbey writes, Gingrich worked feverishly with his buddy Al Gore back in the mid-90′s to help create the embryonic architecture of a global parliamentary authority.
Gingrich’s support for NAFTA, GATT, and the WTO entrenched his position as an enthusiastic advocate of globalism and sending American jobs abroad, the “giant sucking sound,” as Ross Perot labeled it It was Gingrich who helped Bill Clinton and the Democrats garner enough votes from Republicans to pass the North American Free Trade Agreement, which is now quickly evolving into the North American Union.
Gingrich’s Council on Foreign Relations membership and his close relationship with his mentor Henry Kissinger cements his role as a key agitator for the destruction of U.S. sovereignty. Indeed, during a July 1995 speech, he openly decried the constitution as being a roadblock to a UN-managed global government.
“The American challenge in leading the world is compounded by our Constitution,” he said. “Under our [constitutional system] – either we’re going to have to rethink our Constitution, or we’re going to have to rethink our process of decision-making.” He went on to profess an oxymoronic belief in “very strong but limited federal government,” and pledged, “I am for the United Nations.”
“In order to understand just how dedicated Gingrich is to destroying the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, consider that he described himself as a “conservative futurist” who enthusiastically recommended as Speaker of the House his colleagues read Alvin Toffler’s 1980 book The Third Wave,” writes Kurt Nimmo.
“In the book, Toffler wrote a letter to America’s “founding parents,” in which he said: “The system of government you fashioned, including the very principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented – a democracy for the 21st century.” According to Toffler, our constitutional system is one that “served us so well for so long, and that now must, in its turn, die and be replaced.””
The shudder-inducing thought of Newt Gingrich in the White House makes the prospect of a second term for Obama look positively inviting.
At least we know what to expect from Obama. Gingrich is that most dangerous kind of political animal – a wolf in sheep’s clothing – being able to harness the ability of sweet-talking conservatives into calm acquiescence while simultaneously sacrificing America on the altar of globalism.
The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store
Establishment throws its weight behind the ultimate RINO globalist
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Infowars.com
Monday, November 28, 2011
Desperate to derail Ron Paul’s momentum in New Hampshire, the key early primary state in which polls show Paul has a very real chance of winning, the establishment has thrown its weight behind Newt Gingrich, the ultimate RINO globalist who in reality is about as conservative as Mao Tse-tung.
With the campaigns of Mitt Romney and Rick Perry collapsing, the editorial board of the New Hampshire Union Leader chose to endorse Gingrich on Sunday, a move that the mainstream press immediately hailed as all-important, attempting to bestow kingmaker status on a relatively irrelevant newspaper in the grand scheme of things.
The anointment of Gingrich as Republican frontrunner is just the latest desperate bid to fool voters into supporting anyone other than Ron Paul. From Perry, to Romney, to Cain – the establishment has attempted to crown all of them as top dog – failing every time as each campaign subsequently crashes and burns.
Gingrich will inevitably follow suit because he has more skeletons in the closet than a halloween costume shop. Newt Gingrich is Mr. New World Order – a committed globalist who Gingrich will inevitably follow suit because he has more skeletons in the closet than a halloween costume shop. Newt Gingrich is Mr. New World Order – a committed globalist who has publicly made clear his contempt for American sovereignty and freedom on a plethora of occasions, not least when he joined forces with Nancy Pelosi to push the Obama administration’s cap and trade agenda that would have completely bankrupted the country.
“I think if you have mandatory carbon caps combined with a trading system, much like we did with sulfur, and if you have a tax-incentive program for investing in the solutions, that there’s a package there that’s very, very good,” Gingrich told PBS Frontline in February 2007.
And if you think that doesn’t sound bad enough, just wait until you read what Gingrich had to say about mandatory health insurance.
“Personal responsibility extends to the purchase of health insurance. Citizens should not be able to cheat their neighbors by not buying insurance, particularly when they can afford it, and expect others to pay for their care when they need it,” he wrote in a 2007 OpEd for the Des Moines Register.
That’s right – self-proclaimed “conservative” Gingrich is an aggressive supporter of Obamacare, just like his rival Mitt Romney.
Gingrich has also been instrumental in pushing political frameworks with the goal of accomplishing global governance.
As Attorney Constance Cumbey writes, Gingrich worked feverishly with his buddy Al Gore back in the mid-90′s to help create the embryonic architecture of a global parliamentary authority.
Gingrich’s support for NAFTA, GATT, and the WTO entrenched his position as an enthusiastic advocate of globalism and sending American jobs abroad, the “giant sucking sound,” as Ross Perot labeled it It was Gingrich who helped Bill Clinton and the Democrats garner enough votes from Republicans to pass the North American Free Trade Agreement, which is now quickly evolving into the North American Union.
Gingrich’s Council on Foreign Relations membership and his close relationship with his mentor Henry Kissinger cements his role as a key agitator for the destruction of U.S. sovereignty. Indeed, during a July 1995 speech, he openly decried the constitution as being a roadblock to a UN-managed global government.
“The American challenge in leading the world is compounded by our Constitution,” he said. “Under our [constitutional system] – either we’re going to have to rethink our Constitution, or we’re going to have to rethink our process of decision-making.” He went on to profess an oxymoronic belief in “very strong but limited federal government,” and pledged, “I am for the United Nations.”
“In order to understand just how dedicated Gingrich is to destroying the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, consider that he described himself as a “conservative futurist” who enthusiastically recommended as Speaker of the House his colleagues read Alvin Toffler’s 1980 book The Third Wave,” writes Kurt Nimmo.
“In the book, Toffler wrote a letter to America’s “founding parents,” in which he said: “The system of government you fashioned, including the very principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented – a democracy for the 21st century.” According to Toffler, our constitutional system is one that “served us so well for so long, and that now must, in its turn, die and be replaced.””
The shudder-inducing thought of Newt Gingrich in the White House makes the prospect of a second term for Obama look positively inviting.
At least we know what to expect from Obama. Gingrich is that most dangerous kind of political animal – a wolf in sheep’s clothing – being able to harness the ability of sweet-talking conservatives into calm acquiescence while simultaneously sacrificing America on the altar of globalism.
Sunday, August 21, 2011
The Constitution - Death By A Thousand Cuts
DEATH BY A THOUSAND CUTS You, The People, are the only ones
who can Save the Constitution.
We start with a First Principle: Those things allegedly most treasured by our nation including Liberty, justice, wealth, safety and social order arise not by chance or force, but through the institutions of Law and limited government, offered, embraced and manifest by moral, learned and spiritual minds via the collective political instruments now known as our state and federal Constitutions.
It follows naturally that the gross separation or alienation of government officials from our Constitutions must, by definition result in the death of the nation itself.
Each violation heaps an additional, devastating impact on America’s economy, families, moral character, global reputation and the Freedoms of its citizens.
To be sure, if we permit it to happen, the material cause of the demise of Liberty and our Republic will be the cumulative damage and decay resulting from the relentless and escalating number of violations that continue to debase both our state and federal Constitutions. After all, the Constitutions, as rule books designed to govern the government, are all that stand between the People and total tyranny.
Yes, through it all and despite the damage, our democracy will survive; we will go on electing people to office, as this function is necessary in establishing any form of representative government.
What will not survive, however, is the Republic of America -- designed by the greatest governing documents ever given to mankind. Simply put, absent a sea change in the People’s attitude and commitment toward their Constitutions, our Republic’s approaching demise is all but a certainty.
Unless a sufficient number of People decide to soon embrace our Constitutions, and learn to “connect the dots” between the specific provisions and prohibitions of Law provided therein and the malevolent, unlawful behaviors of our elected officials, we are a doomed nation, subject only to the Rule of Men and the tyranny of Power.
Unless the American People soon rekindle and accept personal responsibility to hold all elected officials accountable to those written documents, regardless of their political stripes and whether they voted for them, America’s fate as a Sovereign, lawless ship, captained only by pirates and despots is sealed.
Without a collective constitutional conscience of the People, for the errant impulses of our elected officials to contend with, the (now) unbridled violations of Law will most assuredly drain the remaining life blood from the Republic.
As Jefferson said, political parties are by their nature corruptive. Without a national constitutional conscience, the loyalties of our elected officials will naturally continue to flow away from the Constitution to the Party responsible for designating them for the ballot and its self-serving platforms and objectives.
As Jefferson also said, the People are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our Liberty. Without a national constitutional conscience, the collective belief of the People will continue to be the naive cry of all democracies, i.e., “If you don’t like what is going on, vote for someone else”.
In truth, elections are the crudest form of organized political exercise possible by a “free” People and are the instrument of participation employed by all pure democracies. Elections, in essence, are the tool of those that control the political process, the levers of government and the status quo. Elections, if relied upon as the sole method of exercising the powers of Popular Sovereignty, serve only the will of the majority and the chosen recipients of government beneficence.
Despite the necessity of electing those who wield governmental power, it is the malicious use of elections by which pure democracies sustain the illusion of Liberty, while Individual Rights, i.e., those superior, unalienable Rights and political protections which define the heart of a true Republic, wither and dissolve.
Again, our Constitutions are our Law. They are all that stand between the People and total tyranny.
The Constitution is not a menu and cannot defend itself. That’s up to us, the People.
The Obama Gestopo Says YOU ARE A TERRORIST
You are a terrorist.
Did you know that?
Recently, the FBI started sending copies of a letter to military surplus stores in Colorado under the premise of a new program called “Communities Against Terrorism.”
Their intent is to have Americans report on fellow law-abiding citizens if they suspect them of any terrorist activities.
But here’s the catch: Guess who they want to be viewed as “suspicious”?
People who “insist on paying in cash”;
People who buy “Meals Ready to Eat”;
People who buy “weatherproofed ammunition containers”;
People who buy “high capacity magazines”;
And even people who buy “night flashlights."
I’m willing to bet you fit into at least one or more of those categories.
I know I do.
The Feds are going after a group of Americans known as “preppers.”
Those who want to be prepared for emergencies and possible disasters.
People who don’t want to rely on the government for every possible need – the same type of people who I respect – and feel that they are their own “first responder.”
And now, that kind of attitude is worthy of getting you put on a terrorist watch list.
It is absolutely sickening.
But I haven’t told you the most ironic part.
The Department of Homeland Security, via its website Ready.gov, is currently instructing Americans on “disaster preparedness.”
Upon reading through their recommendations for an “Emergency Supply Kit,” two items jumped out at me…
…flashlights
…and cash.
What this means is, if you go to a military surplus store to purchase these items – one of the cheaper places to shop, in my experience – based on the recommendations of the Department of Homeland Security…
…You might end up on the FBI’s terrorist watch list.
When it’s all said and done, this is the exact type of nonsense that overreaching government authority breeds.
When I sent you Emails about the dangers of the so-called “Patriot Act,” people thought I was overreacting.
Well, here we are.
One government agency putting Americans on terrorist watch lists for buying basic camping equipment at a surplus store, while another government agency is telling you to do that very thing.
This kind of government abuse of freedom is going to get worse – but only if we allow it.
That’s why, with election season rapidly approaching, you and I need to watch and see which politicians stand up against assaults on your liberty.
Keep your eyes and ears open so that you know which one of your legislators turns a blind eye to the abuse of power by government agencies.
I know I’ll be watching, and I will keep you updated every chance I get.
For Freedom,
signature
Dudley Brown
Executive Director
Did you know that?
Recently, the FBI started sending copies of a letter to military surplus stores in Colorado under the premise of a new program called “Communities Against Terrorism.”
Their intent is to have Americans report on fellow law-abiding citizens if they suspect them of any terrorist activities.
But here’s the catch: Guess who they want to be viewed as “suspicious”?
People who “insist on paying in cash”;
People who buy “Meals Ready to Eat”;
People who buy “weatherproofed ammunition containers”;
People who buy “high capacity magazines”;
And even people who buy “night flashlights."
I’m willing to bet you fit into at least one or more of those categories.
I know I do.
The Feds are going after a group of Americans known as “preppers.”
Those who want to be prepared for emergencies and possible disasters.
People who don’t want to rely on the government for every possible need – the same type of people who I respect – and feel that they are their own “first responder.”
And now, that kind of attitude is worthy of getting you put on a terrorist watch list.
It is absolutely sickening.
But I haven’t told you the most ironic part.
The Department of Homeland Security, via its website Ready.gov, is currently instructing Americans on “disaster preparedness.”
Upon reading through their recommendations for an “Emergency Supply Kit,” two items jumped out at me…
…flashlights
…and cash.
What this means is, if you go to a military surplus store to purchase these items – one of the cheaper places to shop, in my experience – based on the recommendations of the Department of Homeland Security…
…You might end up on the FBI’s terrorist watch list.
When it’s all said and done, this is the exact type of nonsense that overreaching government authority breeds.
When I sent you Emails about the dangers of the so-called “Patriot Act,” people thought I was overreacting.
Well, here we are.
One government agency putting Americans on terrorist watch lists for buying basic camping equipment at a surplus store, while another government agency is telling you to do that very thing.
This kind of government abuse of freedom is going to get worse – but only if we allow it.
That’s why, with election season rapidly approaching, you and I need to watch and see which politicians stand up against assaults on your liberty.
Keep your eyes and ears open so that you know which one of your legislators turns a blind eye to the abuse of power by government agencies.
I know I’ll be watching, and I will keep you updated every chance I get.
For Freedom,
signature
Dudley Brown
Executive Director
A Politician That Carries May Still Be Anti-2/cd Admendment
Great news!
Word of gun owners’ victory at the Iowa Straw Poll is spreading. Even one of America’s premier political news sites, Politico.com, has picked up the story about how National Association for Gun Rights members just like you toppled Tim Pawlenty’s Presidential campaign.
The article even noted my subsequent call for NAGR members to lobby Governor Rick Perry to return the National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate Survey.
However, Politco.com writer Maggie Haberman missed the mark when she noted that Perry has a concealed carry permit by assuming he must be pro-gun because he has a concealed weapon permit.
Senator Barbara Boxer, seen vilifying semi-automatic rifles with Dianne Feinstein, has a permit to carry.
The Washington, D.C. elites just don’t get it. They think that simply having a concealed weapon permit automatically makes any politician pro-gun.
Do you think California Democrat Senator Barbara Boxer is pro-gun?
No, I don’t think so, either.
But Barbara Boxer used her influence to secure an elusive concealed carry permit from California.
I can almost hear her trying to deceive gun owners… “Trust me, I have a permit.”
Chuck Schumer -- one of the most anti-gun Senators in Washington D.C. -- obtained a permit to carry for self-defense.
Or how about New York Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer?
Schumer himself is reported to possess a New York concealed handgun permit, and both U.S. Senators regularly employed armed guards for their personal protection.
Just because a politician recognizes that being armed makes THEM safer, doesn’t mean they support YOUR right to keep and bear arms. They think they’re different than you and me, that because of their title they’re entitled to MORE rights than we are.
The Second Amendment is about much more than just carrying concealed… or hunting… or sport shooting.
Your right to keep and bear arms is a bulwark against tyranny.
That’s why the National Association for Gun Rights sends Presidential Candidate Surveys to politicians like Tim Pawlenty and Governor Rick Perry.
Gun owners MUST know where they stand on important issues like banning magazine or bans on certain types of semi-automatic rifles, or opposing the United Nations’ Small Arms Treaty gun-grab.
Please call Rick Perry’s campaign RIGHT NOW at (858) 483-4300 and demand that he return the National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate Survey.
I hope you’ll also take a moment and re-read my e-mail about how NAGR members like you toppled Tim Pawlenty’s Presidential aspirations.
Please, don’t forget to call Governor Perry at (858) 483-4300 and demand that he return the National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate Survey.
For liberty,
-Dudley
From: Dudley Brown [mailto:Dudley.Brown@nationalgunrights.org]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 1:05 PM
Subject: Pawlenty toppled by gun owners
Dear Frank,
Did you hear the noise?
On Saturday, at the Iowa Straw Poll, National Association for Gun Rights members and supporters made themselves heard, advancing two pro-gun candidates and toppling a third anti-gunner.
The winners of the straw poll are solid, pro-gun candidates -- but more on that in a moment.
Tim Pawlenty, an early national favorite to win the Iowa Straw Poll, finished a lack-luster -- and very distant -- third place in the poll and was forced to drop out of the Presidential race on Sunday under pressure from gun owners.
You see, Pawlenty refused to tell gun owners where he stood on important firearms issues. Refusing to return a survey is often an indication that a candidate is hiding something -- often anti-gun beliefs.
The National Association for Gun Rights, and our local partner Iowa Gun Owners, mobilized tens of thousands of gun rights activists across Iowa with phone calls and e-mails urging Pawlenty to return the National Association for Gun Rights survey.
Insiders on the campaign tell us his Iowa campaign office was flooded with phone calls and emails from gun owners demanding Governor Pawlenty make a stand, and return the survey.
National Association for Gun Rights staff and activists even confronted Governor Pawlenty and his campaign staff at the Iowa State Fair, where he continued to rebuff gun owners.
Instead of listening to grassroots gun owners in Iowa, Governor Pawlenty chose to listen to his Washington, D.C. consultants and ignore grassroots gun owners in Iowa, a mistake which cost him at the Straw Poll, and eventually lead to his exit from the race.
Due to the activism of National Association for Gun Rights and Iowa Gun Owners members like you, we were able to educate straw poll voters about the records of ALL the Presidential candidates.
I’m happy to say that Michele Bachmann -- who won the Straw Poll -- and Ron Paul -- who finished in a close second place -- both returned their National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate Survey 100% pro-gun.
In addition to answering the National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate survey 100%, both Michele Bachmann and Ron Paul have pro-gun voting records in Congress (though Bachmann's is marred by her vote for the mis-named Patriot Act a few months ago).
A solid majority of 56% of the voters voted for a pro-gun candidate. The Iowa Straw Poll was a decisive victory for gun owners and the open survey program of your National Association for Gun Rights.
While political insiders like Tim Pawlenty and Herman Cain refuse to return the Presidential Survey, Iowa voters made it clear they demand a pro-gun presidential candidate.
However, a new candidate, Governor Rick Perry of Texas, has entered the race, and we just don’t know where he stands on the Second Amendment.
I’ve sent Governor Perry a survey, and asked him to return it no later than September 15, 2011.
Please click here, and send Rick Perry a message. Ask him to promptly return the National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate Survey.
Governor Perry needs to hear from gun owners today!
Thank you for picking up the phone and letting the candidates know that gun owners demand to know where they stand on the issues facing our right to keep and bear arms.
For Freedom,
signature
Dudley Brown
Executive Director
P.S. Want to help us hold the Presidential candidates accountable? Chip in $15 or $20 to help the National Association for Gun Rights keep fighting.?
Word of gun owners’ victory at the Iowa Straw Poll is spreading. Even one of America’s premier political news sites, Politico.com, has picked up the story about how National Association for Gun Rights members just like you toppled Tim Pawlenty’s Presidential campaign.
The article even noted my subsequent call for NAGR members to lobby Governor Rick Perry to return the National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate Survey.
However, Politco.com writer Maggie Haberman missed the mark when she noted that Perry has a concealed carry permit by assuming he must be pro-gun because he has a concealed weapon permit.
Senator Barbara Boxer, seen vilifying semi-automatic rifles with Dianne Feinstein, has a permit to carry.
The Washington, D.C. elites just don’t get it. They think that simply having a concealed weapon permit automatically makes any politician pro-gun.
Do you think California Democrat Senator Barbara Boxer is pro-gun?
No, I don’t think so, either.
But Barbara Boxer used her influence to secure an elusive concealed carry permit from California.
I can almost hear her trying to deceive gun owners… “Trust me, I have a permit.”
Chuck Schumer -- one of the most anti-gun Senators in Washington D.C. -- obtained a permit to carry for self-defense.
Or how about New York Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer?
Schumer himself is reported to possess a New York concealed handgun permit, and both U.S. Senators regularly employed armed guards for their personal protection.
Just because a politician recognizes that being armed makes THEM safer, doesn’t mean they support YOUR right to keep and bear arms. They think they’re different than you and me, that because of their title they’re entitled to MORE rights than we are.
The Second Amendment is about much more than just carrying concealed… or hunting… or sport shooting.
Your right to keep and bear arms is a bulwark against tyranny.
That’s why the National Association for Gun Rights sends Presidential Candidate Surveys to politicians like Tim Pawlenty and Governor Rick Perry.
Gun owners MUST know where they stand on important issues like banning magazine or bans on certain types of semi-automatic rifles, or opposing the United Nations’ Small Arms Treaty gun-grab.
Please call Rick Perry’s campaign RIGHT NOW at (858) 483-4300 and demand that he return the National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate Survey.
I hope you’ll also take a moment and re-read my e-mail about how NAGR members like you toppled Tim Pawlenty’s Presidential aspirations.
Please, don’t forget to call Governor Perry at (858) 483-4300 and demand that he return the National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate Survey.
For liberty,
-Dudley
From: Dudley Brown [mailto:Dudley.Brown@nationalgunrights.org]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 1:05 PM
Subject: Pawlenty toppled by gun owners
Dear Frank,
Did you hear the noise?
On Saturday, at the Iowa Straw Poll, National Association for Gun Rights members and supporters made themselves heard, advancing two pro-gun candidates and toppling a third anti-gunner.
The winners of the straw poll are solid, pro-gun candidates -- but more on that in a moment.
Tim Pawlenty, an early national favorite to win the Iowa Straw Poll, finished a lack-luster -- and very distant -- third place in the poll and was forced to drop out of the Presidential race on Sunday under pressure from gun owners.
You see, Pawlenty refused to tell gun owners where he stood on important firearms issues. Refusing to return a survey is often an indication that a candidate is hiding something -- often anti-gun beliefs.
The National Association for Gun Rights, and our local partner Iowa Gun Owners, mobilized tens of thousands of gun rights activists across Iowa with phone calls and e-mails urging Pawlenty to return the National Association for Gun Rights survey.
Insiders on the campaign tell us his Iowa campaign office was flooded with phone calls and emails from gun owners demanding Governor Pawlenty make a stand, and return the survey.
National Association for Gun Rights staff and activists even confronted Governor Pawlenty and his campaign staff at the Iowa State Fair, where he continued to rebuff gun owners.
Instead of listening to grassroots gun owners in Iowa, Governor Pawlenty chose to listen to his Washington, D.C. consultants and ignore grassroots gun owners in Iowa, a mistake which cost him at the Straw Poll, and eventually lead to his exit from the race.
Due to the activism of National Association for Gun Rights and Iowa Gun Owners members like you, we were able to educate straw poll voters about the records of ALL the Presidential candidates.
I’m happy to say that Michele Bachmann -- who won the Straw Poll -- and Ron Paul -- who finished in a close second place -- both returned their National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate Survey 100% pro-gun.
In addition to answering the National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate survey 100%, both Michele Bachmann and Ron Paul have pro-gun voting records in Congress (though Bachmann's is marred by her vote for the mis-named Patriot Act a few months ago).
A solid majority of 56% of the voters voted for a pro-gun candidate. The Iowa Straw Poll was a decisive victory for gun owners and the open survey program of your National Association for Gun Rights.
While political insiders like Tim Pawlenty and Herman Cain refuse to return the Presidential Survey, Iowa voters made it clear they demand a pro-gun presidential candidate.
However, a new candidate, Governor Rick Perry of Texas, has entered the race, and we just don’t know where he stands on the Second Amendment.
I’ve sent Governor Perry a survey, and asked him to return it no later than September 15, 2011.
Please click here, and send Rick Perry a message. Ask him to promptly return the National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Candidate Survey.
Governor Perry needs to hear from gun owners today!
Thank you for picking up the phone and letting the candidates know that gun owners demand to know where they stand on the issues facing our right to keep and bear arms.
For Freedom,
signature
Dudley Brown
Executive Director
P.S. Want to help us hold the Presidential candidates accountable? Chip in $15 or $20 to help the National Association for Gun Rights keep fighting.?
Monday, August 15, 2011
THE ARTICLES OF FREEDOM
Articles of Freedom Liberty Coalation
...And so it is proposed that these Articles be distributed to All in the Land, with the intent to draw the attention and courage of a “goodly number of millions of People” who, entitled to their Freedom and essential to Its maintenance, Arise to Restore and maintain the Constitution for the United States of America...
Then, and only then, will America's Destiny be Fulfilled.
The goal is to present a clear demonstration of the power of the People to hold our elected officials accountable to the Constitution, by claiming and exercising their natural, unalienable Right to do so, all as guaranteed by the accountability clause of the First Amendment. This will require civic action by a pro-active, non-violent, mass-movement having nothing to do with politics or the electoral process.
The Articles of Freedom are intended to be the FREE vehicle around which a critical mass of People can rally and Pledge their mutual support, leading to the manifestation of that demonstration of legal, constitutional, Peaceful People Power – the day of reckoning, a settling of accounts between the People and their Government regarding their fundamental roles and relationships.
To accomplish the goal of restoring our Constitution and then maintaining citizen vigilance that seeks to hold our elected officials accountable forevermore, individuals and small groups cannot prevail in the Cause that is before us.
While each of us surely has a role to play, it will take all of us coming together and standing as ONE now to ensure America fulfills Her Destiny.
INDIVIDUALS AND SMALL GROUPS CANNOT PREVAIL IN THE CAUSE THAT IS BEFORE US.
EVEN NOTABLE ORGANIZATIONS, DEDICATED TO FREEDOM, CANNOT SUCCEED ALONE, OPERATING IN THEIR CORRIDORS AND ACTIVITIES.
WHILE EACH OF US SURELY HAS A ROLE TO PLAY, IT WILL TAKE ALL OF US COMING TOGETHER AND STANDING AS ONE NOW, TO ENSURE AMERICA FULFILLS HER PURPOSE.
WE NEED SOLIDARITY NOW MORE THAN EVER BEFORE.
Join the growing coalition! Click here to be added to this page
...And so it is proposed that these Articles be distributed to All in the Land, with the intent to draw the attention and courage of a “goodly number of millions of People” who, entitled to their Freedom and essential to Its maintenance, Arise to Restore and maintain the Constitution for the United States of America...
Then, and only then, will America's Destiny be Fulfilled.
The goal is to present a clear demonstration of the power of the People to hold our elected officials accountable to the Constitution, by claiming and exercising their natural, unalienable Right to do so, all as guaranteed by the accountability clause of the First Amendment. This will require civic action by a pro-active, non-violent, mass-movement having nothing to do with politics or the electoral process.
The Articles of Freedom are intended to be the FREE vehicle around which a critical mass of People can rally and Pledge their mutual support, leading to the manifestation of that demonstration of legal, constitutional, Peaceful People Power – the day of reckoning, a settling of accounts between the People and their Government regarding their fundamental roles and relationships.
To accomplish the goal of restoring our Constitution and then maintaining citizen vigilance that seeks to hold our elected officials accountable forevermore, individuals and small groups cannot prevail in the Cause that is before us.
While each of us surely has a role to play, it will take all of us coming together and standing as ONE now to ensure America fulfills Her Destiny.
INDIVIDUALS AND SMALL GROUPS CANNOT PREVAIL IN THE CAUSE THAT IS BEFORE US.
EVEN NOTABLE ORGANIZATIONS, DEDICATED TO FREEDOM, CANNOT SUCCEED ALONE, OPERATING IN THEIR CORRIDORS AND ACTIVITIES.
WHILE EACH OF US SURELY HAS A ROLE TO PLAY, IT WILL TAKE ALL OF US COMING TOGETHER AND STANDING AS ONE NOW, TO ENSURE AMERICA FULFILLS HER PURPOSE.
WE NEED SOLIDARITY NOW MORE THAN EVER BEFORE.
Join the growing coalition! Click here to be added to this page
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)